This is a test version of Biostars. For the public version, visit https://www.biostars.org.
Should we update time periods in a Bibliometric analysis even after completing it, if it's found to be generating biased results due to recent study?

Suppose a bibliometric analysis was conducted to uncover new research discoveries, but it was later discovered that similar research had already been carried out. In such a scenario, what would be the appropriate course of action to pursue?

  • Shall we update the time intervals?
  • Should we update and rewrite both the findings and the article?

Please help with this, thanks in advance.

review bibliometric offtopic

This post does not fit the theme of this forum.

0 answers

No answers yet.

Log in to answer this question.