Is the null hypothesis invalid or is there no evidence against the null hypothesis (like what dariober says here: same padj for all the genes after DEseq analysis)
Deseq2 returned the same p-adj for several genes
1 answer
In a nutshell: your null hypothesis is invalid. Please re-think your experimental design.
Kevin
NB: Kevin Blighe I'm restoring the content. Please do not delete it again.
• 0 views
•
link
updated
by
Ram
•
written
by
Kevin Blighe
•
written
by
Kevin Blighe
Either / or, Sir.
• 0 views
•
link
updated
by
Ram
•
written
by
Kevin Blighe
•
written
by
Kevin Blighe
Who cares. It won't solve World hunger.
• 0 views
•
link
updated
by
Ram
•
written
by
Kevin Blighe
•
written
by
Kevin Blighe
You are raising philosophical questions that are causing my brain to explode ¯\_(:/)_/¯ I believe, with my answer, I was implying that the hypothesis that gene expression differs between the conditions being compared was invalid, and that one needed to re-think this set / design.
• 0 views
•
link
updated
by
Ram
•
written
by
Kevin Blighe
•
written
by
Kevin Blighe
Could be, Sir Ram.
• 0 views
•
link
updated
by
Ram
•
written
by
Kevin Blighe
•
written
by
Kevin Blighe
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
High adj. p-value/FDR despite large FC and high expression levels
written by nik.kraemer •
-
Proteomics : imputation of missing values in all replicates
written by lagartija
-
Differing p-value cutoffs of limma derived DEGs in volcanoplots
written by JirMan •
-
Large-scale bulk RNAseq Experiment with abnormal MA-plots for apoptotic conditions
written by Nico •
-
Weird looking dispersion & MA plot?
written by Zygpy •
-
Why after normalization of scRNA-Seq data by DESeq2 the p-value of a large number of genes equal ze…
written by Zahra •
-
How to obtain all genes associated with a given GO term from PANTHER API enrichment analysis
written by gt •
-
Complex DESeq2 sample file set up
written by rva_jango •
-
DeSeq2 analysis - very low variability among replicates
written by srhic •
-
Histogram plot of padj values
written by cado •
Did you do a basic google search before creating a new post here? There are a lot of posts on multiple forums addressing this question.
https://www.google.com/search?q=deseq2+padj+all+the+same
I'm sorry. I didn't mean to cause you any inconvenience, Ram. I'm old and not sure how the Web works yet. This blog thing is new territory for me. Again, I'm sincerely sorry if my question upset you, Ram. It was not my intention. My colleague created this profile a while ago, in case I needed some help. Thank you for your reply. It was very helpful. Best regards.
You're not causing me any inconvenience, this is not personal. It is now widely known that using Google for any question you have serves up possible solutions or at least connects you to other people that have had a similar experience or have similar questions. People abuse this availability of information to think they're qualified to question experts (like being skeptical of all vaccines because some blog mentioned some lone study) but not using this ubiquitous information to get quick answers to your question is just weird. Any way, that's one way the Web works in my opinion - you use a search engine to get to the information you need.