what should I do if I get a compromised sample of scRNA-seq data?
Hi everyone,
Recently, I got my snRNA-seq data. But after aligned to reference genome using cellranger, I got a wired barcode rank plot. what should I do next to correct this data?
• 1,005 views
•
link
updated
by
ATpoint
•
written
by
wangjb702 •
•
written
by
wangjb702 •
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
why 99% reads failed to align in mir-seq analysis?
written by mohammadhassanj
-
original single cell data downloaded from GEO yielded only two files with 150bp
written by chenglei1865 •
-
Fastq with very poor per tile quality but excellent perbase quality - is this a tampered fastQ?
written by Arun •
-
cellranger outputs to IGV
written by littleju777 •
-
Why my `Percent duplicates` in a shallow sequencing is too high?
written by 631079064 •
-
Is the current R version (4.1.2) are not suitable for the packages related with TCGA
written by nonaddldy •
-
Sequence Duplication Levels
written by Elizaveta •
-
Can not plot degree distribution in Cytoscape Network Analyzer on logscale
written by bhodai •
-
[Errno 2] No such file or directory: '0-rawreads' when I run Falcon unzip with hifi data
written by Feng •
-
How can I add text label outside the tree in iTOL ?
written by anran04100 •
The knee plot is just one type of QC. I'd say just proceed with your analysis and see if you observe anything funky (analysis itself is a QC). You should also see if you can use a tool that removes doublets and ambient RNA, if that helps your analysis.
Agreed. I would just force the cells to 5000 or so, and then proceed with the normal QC. If there's a lot of trash "cells" in the dataset this will manifest by poor QC metrics such as number of detected genes and mitochondrial expression percentage (since mt genes usually are highly-expressed so they're always detected first), plus "trash" tends (in my experience) to cluster together with marker genes that make no biological sense. Just try a bit, see what works.