Indeed, I thought the quality might be a factor. Still, given the information, it seems odd to me that that call was made.
Thanks for your answer!
Hi there,
I'm confused about how to interpret this output from calling variants using bcftools:
#CHROM POS ID REF ALT QUAL FILTER INFO FORMAT GSM5292852
1065632 chr9 41242177 . T C 6.65947 . DP=37;VDB=0.133454;SGB=-0.662043;RPBZ=2.91136;MQBZ=4.0715;BQBZ=1.05041;SCBZ=-0.480069;MQ0F=0;AC=2;AN=2;DP4=0,26,0,9;MQ=5 GT:PL:AD 1/1:34,24,0:26,9
In particular, I'm confused by the genotype being reported as 1/1 while the number of reads mapping to the reference vs. the alternative allele are 26 and 9, respectively.
Wouldn't this indicate a heterozygous or possibly homozygous ref. genotype?
Any insight would be much appreciated.
You're right, but MQ=5 - so this is a really poorly mappable region.
Check the QUAL field - here 6.6 - against more typical and robust SNPs you've found. I bet it is at the lower range of the QUAL distribution - but don't use bcftools for SNP calling myself.
Indeed, I thought the quality might be a factor. Still, given the information, it seems odd to me that that call was made.
Thanks for your answer!
Log in to answer this question.