Thank you very much for your help. I'll give this a try.
I am not quite sure what kind of category or tags this question should fall under, so I hope people won't mind me leaving them quite vague.
I am currently trying to find a way of using a pipeline for the detection of R-genes (https://github.com/AndolfoG/HRP#1) on the Oak genome. However, unfortunately this pipeline works in a way that requires both a reference genome and reference proteome sequence encoded by the same gene set. A reference proteome is not currently available for Oak.
Now I could generate my own reference proteome using TransDecoder (https://github.com/TransDecoder/TransDecoder/wiki) from a reference transcriptome. But this reference transcriptome was created by another lab and is thus annotated differently. So proteins and genes would have different names.
Is there a way I could reconcile the reference genome and a reference proteome generated from a reference transcriptome created by another lab. Or do they both have to be under the same annotation/ naming scheme from the start? which would make this impossible.
1 answer
NCBI has a genome version that should be all in sync: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/?term=Quercus+robur
You can find the genome, transcriptome and protein sequences all in one spot. Perhaps you could use this version?
Log in to answer this question.
Can you provide the scientific name of exact Oak species you are referring?
Quercus robur. The reference genome I have always used is the one created by Plomion et al. (https://www.oakgenome.fr/?page_id=587). And the highly comprehensive reference transcriptome I could generate the proteome from is the OakContigDF159.1 hybrid assembly (https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/nph.12317)