It’s simple to parse. Simply take the coordinates annotated as .`gene`transcript and those annotated as exon. Take the complement, so gene transcript minus exon, that’s the introns.
If you google the question there are multiple threads on that here at biostars already.
If you want the exact intron ranges you would need to modify the above by looking per transcript. Doing it per gene would give you regions contained within the introns of all transcripts, but not proper introns per say.
In a sense, yes it is wrong because it doesn't capture biological complexity of alternative splicing. If you have simple gene models where each gene has a single annotated transcript, then it would suffice, but only because the gene models do not capture the real biology well.
Imagine these hypothetical transcripts for the same gene:
If you look at genes in a genome browser you will find even more complex cases. Therefore, it becomes very clear that introns depend on the actual transcript.
Hello Can anybody tell me how to extract promoter coordinates from transcriptome.gtf file generated after cuffmerge result, file only contains exon, or is there any …
Hello I am beginner in computational field, please help me to find coordinates of 5primeUTR & 3primeUTR from transcriptome data generated after cuffmerge contains only …
Hello researchers, I am stuck in my project and require an effective solution 1. How to extract promoter sequences from rice transcriptome.gtf file? 2. How …
Hello researchers, I am stuck in project and require effective solutions 1. How to find out protein coding genes and transposable elements from rice transcriptome.gtf …
It’s simple to parse. Simply take the coordinates annotated as
.`gene`transcriptand those annotated asexon. Take the complement, sogenetranscript minus exon, that’s the introns.If you google the question there are multiple threads on that here at biostars already.
If you want the exact intron ranges you would need to modify the above by looking per transcript. Doing it per gene would give you regions contained within the introns of all transcripts, but not proper introns per say.
Indeed, good catch!
i have done intergenic minus exon for intron coordinates, that is wrong ?
In a sense, yes it is wrong because it doesn't capture biological complexity of alternative splicing. If you have simple gene models where each gene has a single annotated transcript, then it would suffice, but only because the gene models do not capture the real biology well.
Imagine these hypothetical transcripts for the same gene:
If you look at genes in a genome browser you will find even more complex cases. Therefore, it becomes very clear that introns depend on the actual transcript.