different pileups between sorted.bam file and bigwig file
Hi,
I am using the following command from deeptools package to convert my sorted bam files to bigwig format to have smaller files that I can easily load into IGV.
bamCoverage --bam Sample.sorted.bam -o Sample.bw
I loaded both sorted.bam and bigwig file into IGV tool and I noticed that bigwig track doesn't show the pileups as they are in bam track.
Do you have any idea what I am doing anything wrong?
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Log2FC track Visualization in IGV
written by SomeOne •
-
IGV not showing bigwig track information
written by Rory Osborne •
-
Error: unrecognized arguments using deepTools bamCoverage
written by Daria •
-
Loading possorted_genome_bam.bam generated by 10X cellranger count command into IGV.
written by bioyas •
-
quantify counts from sorted bam files using a bed file containing regions of interest
written by bioyas •
-
How to perform normalization when converting ATAC bam file to bigwig file using deeptools for IGV v…
written by sir.outman •
-
Reads detected/"spill over" on introns after using bamCoverage function from deepTools
written by kdcastillo •
-
getting 0 counts using hisat2 and feature_count pipeline
written by bioyas •
-
Different bigwig file sizes between BedgraphToBigwig and bamCoverage
written by m98
-
Sort/Index bam prior to peak-calling ChIP-seq & deeptools bigwig visualisation
written by andrew.phipps.00 •
Details needed, such as a screenshot. We cannot see your screen or read minds.
Hi, Here is two screenshots from random places. in each image the blue line is from bigwig file and below it is the sorted bam file.