Explanation of dimension differences between bam files (BWA aln and BWA mem)
Hello everyone,
I want to compare the output .bam files generated by two different algorithms: BWA aln and mem, in order to replace the old code (aln) with the new one (mem)
For aln alignment I ran the following command:
bwa aln -o 1 -n 0.01 -l 200 -e 12 -d 12 -t 30 'ref.fa' 'pair_1.fastq' 'pair_2.fastq.gz' | samtools sort -@30 -o out.aln.bam
For mem:
bwa mem -t 30 -M 'ref.fa' 'pair_1.fastq' 'pair_2.fastq' | samtools sort -@30 -o out.mem.bam -
The dimension of out.aln.bam resulted in 24689 MB. The dimension of out.mem.bam resulted in 31069 MB.
Considering that the input fastq files are the same, how can I explain this huge difference in dimensions? Is it due to options in aln?
Thanks in advice
• 1,237 views
•
link
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
Rather than comparing the file sizes, you should compare the alignment statistics.