If I get better estimates of dispersion, is the variance better reflected in the gene expression for a given mean value? So you think it is a better way to compare all groups vs E?
DESeq2 with multiple variable give me different results
I am doing a DESeq2 comparison with different levels and one factor. To do this, I have performed the analysis in two different ways.
First, putting all the samples in the same DESeq object and then extracting each comparison:
> sampleinfo
FileName SampleName Status
A_1_count A_1 A
A_2_count A_2 A
B_3_count B_3 B
B_4_count B_4 B
C_5_count C_5 C
C_6_count C_6 C
D_7_count D_7 D
D_8_count D_8 D
E_9_count E_9 E
E_10_count E_10 E
dds <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData = cts,
colData = sampleinfo,
design = ~ Status)
dds$Status <- relevel(dds$Status, ref = "E")
And the results:
dds <- DESeq(dds)
res_A <- results(dds,name="Status_A_vs_E")
res_B <- results(dds,name="Status_B_vs_E")
res_C <- results(dds,name="Status_C_vs_E")
res_D <- results(dds,name="Status_D_vs_E")
And doing these comparisons one by one separately on different DESeq objects.
> sampleinfo_A
FileName SampleName Status
A_1_count A_1 A
A_2_count A_2 A
E_9_count E_9 E
E_10_count E_10 E
> sampleinfo_B
FileName SampleName Status
B_3_count B_3 B
B_4_count B_4 B
E_9_count E_9 E
E_10_count E_10 E
dds_A <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData = cts_A,
colData = sampleinfo_A,
design = ~ Status)
dds_B <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData = cts_B,
colData = sampleinfo_B,
design = ~ Status)
And the results:
dds_A <- DESeq(dds_A)
res_A <- results(dds_A)
dds_B <- DESeq(dds_B)
res_B <- results(dds_B)
(Repeat for each condition)
However, the results give me different between the 2 methods. Does anyone know why is this happening? How it is the correct way to compare all to E?
Thank you!
• 2,316 views
•
link
1 answer
Log in to answer this question.