Hi, I've performed DE analysis within seurat on a specific cluster across two conditions and used the DE summary table within the R package iDEA to try and identify certain pathways that are significant.
However, the results from iDEA didn't give any pathways that were significant, and I'm not sure if its a real lack of results or due to problems with my DE data. Specifically alot of the DE genes had p values that were very low (beyond that which R can hold) so that they gave values of 0 making the beta_variance used in the data also 0. I'm not sure if that causes problems within iDEA or not
Does anyone know if the p values being 0 actually causes problems and if so how I can fix the data?
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
-
Should differential expression analysis be incorporated in cross validation for training machine le…
written by yordany.perdigon •
-
gProfiler vs Panther_go in overrepresentation pathways R analysis
written by tchosange •
-
fgsea/clusterProfiler Packages for nCounter data enrichment analysis
written by RM123 •
-
Removal of genes that fail independent filtering in deseq2 for fGSEA
written by Stevens •
-
Best approach to finding correlation between two genes from MAGIC imputed single-cell RNA-seq data
written by Stevens •
-
Obtaining gene specific annotations for mouse genes
written by Stevens •
-
Import Salmon output by tximport
written by koaeb •
-
Network/Pathway Analysis from Mass Spec data
written by Mozart
-
Differential expression in qPCR Data after filtering
written by Juan Cordero
-
Unusual notation of p-values
written by lvogel •
