This is a test version of Biostars. For the public version, visit https://www.biostars.org.
Differential expression in qPCR Data after filtering

Dear community,

I have qPCR data samples with a lot of noise and a general low amplification. Many Ct values are set therefore to 40 (or NA, I'm using R package HTqPCR). My question is whether I should filter out "genes where the results are of low quality" before performing DE analysis, and how I can trust the p-values. Are results not going to be misleading if I significant fraction of the genes is removed from the analysis?

Thanks in advance

qpcr differential expression
• 2,837 views • link
updated by Devon Ryan Devon Ryan • written by Juan Cordero Juan Cordero

2 answers

You can go ahead and discard the Ct ~40 genes, you don't have the ability to measure any changes in them to begin with. The results won't be misleading if you remove them.

• 2 views • link
written by Devon Ryan Devon Ryan

Hi Devon, I see your point. However, what if a gene becomes measurable (or unmeasurable) only after the treatment? Also, if he ends up removing, say, 60% of the studied genes, the overall conclusions might be misleading (e.g. he might think his treatment favors up-regulation of a certain class of transcription factors, that were instead simply comparatively more easy to measure).

• 2 views • link
written by Anima Mundi Anima Mundi

If only one group has such a high Ct then that's not a problem. Filter by the average or median Ct across groups.

• 2 views • link
written by Devon Ryan Devon Ryan

Yes, they are going to be misleading. I would rather try to optimize your wetlab workflow (e.g. changing PCR primers).

• 2 views • link
written by Anima Mundi Anima Mundi

Log in to answer this question.

More posts like this