Is possible to annotated results %0 assigned using featureCounts?
• 0 views
•
link
written
by
santos48 •
Creating Annotation GTF/GFF file
Hello everyone, I have human Rna-Seq data reading by MiniOn.I aligned with the human reference genome (GRCh38.p13) from that website= https://www.gencodegenes.org/human/ using minimap2. Then I extract specific regions on the bam file using samtools. For the starting DESeq2, I tried to featureCounts with reference annotation folder bam file %5 assigned according to multiqc report.
How to create an annotation folder for quantification?
• 2,735 views
•
link
updated
by
Zhilong Jia
•
written
by
santos48 •
•
written
by
santos48 •
1 answer
• 0 views
•
link
written
by
Zhilong Jia
Yes, depends on actual reads which can be mapped to this region.
• 0 views
•
link
written
by
Zhilong Jia
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
featureCounts output summary assigned value higher than uniquely mapped reads from HISAT2
written by Prawesh •
-
Is there any tutorial page that tells you how to extract read count from illumina single-cell RNAse…
written by Simon Ahn •
-
How to analyze the scRNA seq Fastq files from NCBI
written by aimanbarki •
-
Extract human, mouse and pig aligned reads from .bam file alignment to conactenated genomes
written by daewowo •
-
Total Alignment: 0 /results of featureCounts RNA-Seq
written by santos48 •
-
Salmon Quant /SubRead featureCounts Results Total Aligments:0
written by santos48 •
-
RNA-Seq featureCounts Results Annotation File
written by santos48 •
-
FeatureCounts Number of Reads
written by santos48 •
-
How to Extract Specific Region on Bam file
written by santos48 •
-
RNA-seq from Nanopore featureCounts
written by v.shapovalova1 •
Then I extract specific regions on the bam file using samtools.why extract specific regions were used?
For the starting DESeq2, I tried to featureCounts with reference annotation folder bam file %5 assigned according to multiqc report.unclear.
I extracted specific regions because of those regions I will research. I have noisy data that's why I extracted and annotated it. Then I checked results with multiqc in the results, samples assigned just %5.
as you used only a subset of the genome, the 5% mapping rate is possible, regardless of the contaminated data.