driver genes per sample or per group?
When using driver genes prediction tools such as ONCOCLUST in maftools or dNdScv, should we input the variants of per samples? or per group (same treatment/disease)?
Both tutorials use input that were from multiple subjects. Is driver genes are usually described as per group/population instead of subject/sample?
• 1,268 views
•
link
updated
by
rohitsatyam102
•
written
by
whb •
•
written
by
whb •
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Normalization of RNA captureSeq data (<20 genes captured)
written by jips •
-
Estimating power in RNA-seq differential expression
written by ams686 •
-
updated in-silico scoring system for missense variants
written by cocchi.e89
-
Use DESeqDataSetFromMatrix from a matrix of normalized read counts
written by celia.escher •
-
RNAseq differential expression analysis : relevance of Immunoglobulin genes enrichment ?
written by guillaume.rbt
-
Driver mutation vs biomarker vs recurrent mutation
written by CY
-
Question about analysis design in DeSeq2
written by jillianrjaycox •
-
RNA-seq batch effect correction
written by endikavarela •
-
Dependent samples in DESeq2 - How to incorporate random factor?
written by aggregatibacter
-
Tool: Variant Annotation, Analysis and Search Tool - VAAST2
written by Zev.Kronenberg
Did you get an answer to your query? I have the same question in mind.