Question About The Music Pathscan Fdr Value
I have a basic question for the FDR output of pathscan integrated in music.
According to my shallow understanding for multiple test correction, the corrected q-values will retain the order of p-values regardless of the correcting methods. Am I right? Yet, for the output of pathscan, I found that is not the case such as the following two items. I have ignored some columns such as Name and etc.
Pathway p-value FDR
05213 0.0036179 0.03765905
04270 0.0041739 0.0092798359223301
And below is my command
genome music path-scan --bam-list bam_list --gene-covg-dir ../bmr_calc/gene_covgs/ --maf-file merge_all.maf --output-file pathscan_result --pathway-file music_pathscan_pathway_file_go_bp --bmr 4.0422059127903e-06
Is that the expected behavior for the FDR correction for pathscan? And if that is the case, what is the correcting method used by pathscan?
Look forward to your response.
• 2,332 views
•
link
updated
by
Neilfws
•
written
by
xiaoqiaoliu •
•
written
by
xiaoqiaoliu •
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Music Path-Scan Problem
written by zhouyunyun11 •
-
Genome Music Path-Scan Negative P-Value?
written by John St. John
-
Music Calcroicovg Core Dump: "Floating Point Exception"
written by Alastair Droop •
-
Error When Running The Music Bmr
written by yliubu •
-
Genome Music Calc-Wig-Covg Uninitialized Error
written by NickA5133 •
-
Problems Running Bmr Calc-Covg On Music By Washu
written by Ashwini Patil •
-
Error - Skipping Invalid Roi
written by sharan.janjuha •
-
Music Bmr Calc-Bmr: Division By Zero Error
written by cfan2004 •
-
Calcbmr Of Music(0.4) Error: Error Runing Command Joinx1.6
written by Ryo Murasaki •
-
Problems About Music
written by yliubu •
You are correct that FDR values should be in the same order as the p-values. The PathScan author is looking into this, and will provide an answer <del>soon</del>.