Hi, I think its not true in context with Macs14 of what they call as effective genome size. See this It's the mappable genome size or effective genome size which is defined as the genome size which can be sequenced. Because of the
repetitive features on the chromsomes, the actual mappable genome size will be smaller than the original size, about 90% or 70% of the genome size. The default hs — 2.7e9 is recommended for UCSC human hg18 assembly. Here are all precompiled parameters for effective genome size
So, I would assume it to be little more or less than the 1.87e9, what they estimated for mm9 by removing the repetitive region. A similar post : http://biostars.org/post/show/19380/
Any reason you don't want to use the mm9 value? I can't imagine it's that different, and if their method is that sensitive to this parameter, you probably won't be too happy anyways...
Yeah, I think the results wouldn't be effected that much, still just thought someone have already done the exercise calculating it :)
I'm going to try this tool GEM for a different genome, you could try it. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/macs-announcement/-iIDkVwenn8