Cannot convert gene ID to gene symbol

I am using the microarray data from GEO (GSE116486).

For example, "1563061_at" is cannot be converted to gene symbol. I used DAVID, metascape and other available ID convert website but, the results are the same(couldn't get the genesymbol).

My question is "Are there still exists the gene with no symbol?" If yes, does it mean that there are chances or potential to find the novelty?

I would appreciate it if someone could answer.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE116486

gene

• 1,888 views • link

written 5.5 years ago by PNTick •

Thank you very much for answering my question. I see...

Thank you very much with R code! All my cobweb are just gone now!

• 0 views • link

written 5.5 years ago by PNTick •

2 answers

Yes, predicted genes may not necessarily have yet been assigned an ID by Ensembl, Entrez, HGNC, et cetera.

This probe genuinely has no matches:

require('hgu133plus2.db')
annotLookup <- select(hgu133plus2.db, keys = c('1563061_at'),
  columns = c('PROBEID', 'ENSEMBL', 'SYMBOL', 'ENTREZID', 'REFSEQ'))
annotLookup
     PROBEID ENSEMBL SYMBOL ENTREZID REFSEQ
1 1563061_at    <NA>   <NA>     <NA>   <NA>

If we look at the UCSC Genome Browser, we can begin to see why there are no matches: https://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgTracks?db=hg19&lastV...

That 'gene', BC039487, is hypothetical.

Kevin

• 0 views • link

written 5.5 years ago by Kevin Blighe

Adding on this, it could also be a control probe that serves as internal control to check how probes that should not change behave after normalization/testing etc. So if you do not find a match in the browser then it is probably a control probe.

• 0 views • link

written 5.5 years ago by ATpoint

Actually I didin't know what the control probe is all about...!

Hmm, so, can I think of the control probe as being artificially created to see if the condition(normal or diseased) remains the same after normalization or testing?

• 0 views • link

written 5.5 years ago by PNTick •

They will usually be left in the dataset, even after normalisation. However, these probes should begin with AFFX or BGP - see here: A: Control probe sets in Affymetrix ST microarrays

...and you should indeed remove these after normalisation.

• 0 views • link

written 5.5 years ago by Kevin Blighe

Hi :)

I am not sure whether this serves as a valuable answer, but when using R, this might be an easy task. There are several Bioconductor packages, which will convert GeneIDs to Gene Names rather easily.

e.g.

loading some packages first

if (!requireNamespace("BiocManager", quietly = TRUE)) install.packages("BiocManager") BiocManager::install("Homo.sapiens") library(Homo.sapiens) require(GenomicRanges)

then run:

genes(TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg19.knownGene) [this command saves all the gene names and IDs into a data frame]
gene_names = as.data.frame(org.Hs.egSYMBOL) [this command saves all the gene names and IDs into a data frame]

then simply merge your IDs with gene_names, like:

out = merge(gene_names, your_ID's, by.x = 'ID', by.y = 'ID', all.y = T)

note: (the syntax above just serves as example): 'by.x' and 'by.y' might differ in your code; as I am not entirely sure about the column names, etc.

best, chris.

• 0 views • link

written 5.5 years ago by christoph.kreitzer93 •