NCBI build=37 in MAF despite using GRCm38 all along the variant calling workflow
I have called variants with GRCm38 and annotated with snpeff with in built GRCm38.99.genome. When doing snpefftomaf.pl NCBI build column in the MAF file is 37?
I checked the header of the VCF and confirmed it was GRCm38 that I used.
Is there a way to check if the NCBI build was detected wrong or if I did use the wrong build?
Thank you again!
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Not all variants are annotated with AF - expected or a problem?
written by Luiz •
-
Filtering data from snpEFF annotated file
written by Peerzada •
-
Determine strand info of somatic mutations
written by whb •
-
Fasta file for Whole exome sequencing analysis
written by tomer9w •
-
Snpefftomaf error: Changing the format column in vcf file
written by whb •
-
vcf2maf not generating `t_depth t_ref_count t_alt_count` columns in MAF file
written by Alejandro Jimenez Sanchez
-
SNPeff: can I just use hg19?
written by Marvin
-
build37 against hg19
written by Daisy •
-
variant annotation issue
written by prasundutta87
-
TCGA Mutation Annotation Files (MAFs) with ref_context column
written by Alejandro Jimenez Sanchez
What is
snpefftomaf.pl, is this a custom script? Not much to say without you linking to the source of that tool.Hi, this is the tool https://github.com/tsy19900929/snpeffToMaf
It has build 37 hardcoded according to the source code, nothing you can do about it. I did not check though whether this line has any impact on the code, there is no documentation available therefore random scripts from Github are usually to be used with care. Maybe open an issue and ask the developer what to do.