could I use cell deconvolution tools (like CIBERSORT) in 3'quantseq data?
Hello. I would like to ask if I could use CIBERSORT(with the LM22 signature matrix) or XCELL in 3'quantseq data? Thank you!
• 1,548 views
•
link
updated
by
Biostar
•
written
by
eridanus •
•
written
by
eridanus •
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Confidence in CIBERSORT (LM22) Deconvolution Output for Rare Cell Types — Best Practices?
written by Pumla •
-
immunedeconv for RNAseq data
written by a.stef.44 •
-
Downstream analysis for CIBERSORTx imputed cell-specific gene expression
written by Fred Lawrence •
-
Can a Binary Signature Matrix Be Used in CIBERSORT for Deconvolution?
written by DareDevil
-
Creating a Single-Cell Signature Matrix for Bulk RNA-seq Deconvolution
written by Lloyd98 •
-
error in fun(x((i)), ...) : only defined on a data frame with all numeric alike variables
written by Azra •
-
p-value in CIBERSORT
written by michelafrancesconi9 •
-
CIBERSORT: Run Error
written by Myung-Gwan •
-
for go enrichment analysis which tool do you recommend?
written by eridanus •
-
SIGNATURE MATRIX IN CIBERSORT
written by pierangela.bruno •
For the sake of providing a comment, the information you give are not sufficient to answer. Usually it is the number of samples, quality, presence of batch effects, composition etc. that tells whether you can or cannot use a certain tool, not the specific kit that was used to produce the samples.
Thank you for your answer! I have 12 samples, no batch effects. RIN was not that good, that is the reason why 3'quantseq instead of total rnaseq was applied. When I run Cibersort, CibersortX, Xcell, p-values are > 0.05.