Deconvolution of bulk RNA sequencing PBMC: different results for different methods
Hi all,
I am running deconvolution on a PBMC bulk RNA sequencing data in R. The problem is that I get very different results when using different methods: quantiseq CIBERSORT EPIC ABIS
Besides EPIC it seems that most methods are having difficulty characterizing the cells fractions. I would expect that a well established method would be able to recognize a PBMC data and therefor I won't have a large fraction of cells which are uncharacterized when using appropriate reference matrix.
How can I tell which method yields the best result?
Does anyone have an experience with one of the methods on PBMC/in general?
All the best
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Best choices for DGE and pathway enrichment analysis in single cell data using pseudobulk?
written by txema.heredia •
-
Absolute vs. differential gene expression - which analysis is more informative?
written by bioinfo1990 •
-
Forum: How to do datamining in bioinformatics
written by Biomed-jeh •
-
Creating a Single-Cell Signature Matrix for Bulk RNA-seq Deconvolution
written by Lloyd98 •
-
Exploring Diet Effects in Single-Cell RNA Sequencing
written by Darya •
-
comparing sc-seq combination and bulk-sequencing
written by 润达 •
-
How to get transcripts lengths from RNAseq data to calculate TPM
written by MatStat
-
cell type deconvolution with Cibersort
written by chuxj1128 •
-
cell type deconvolution with Cibersort
written by chuxj1128 •
-
Correcting for tumor purity in tumor evolution analysis
written by cbst
