Alternative Splicing Analysis
Hi all,
I am looking to analyze differential splicing across control and experimental samples. The lab I joined has previously used rMATS to quantify alternative splicing events, yet after some research it appears psichomics is more modern and maybe easier to use? Any suggestions or comments on the differences/advantages of using one or the other?
• 168 views
•
link
written
by
noahhelton98 •
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
News: RNA-Seq Analysis (RNAA02)
written by coursesinfo •
-
Blog: Using Long-read Sequencing Technology to Explore the Complex Structure of Transcripts
written by Novogene •
-
Aberrant splicing in bulk RNAseq
written by txema.heredia •
-
Job: Postdoc Fellows @ New York City: Long-read Multi-omics to Characterize Human Diseases
written by fanggang
-
Job: Postdoc Fellow @ New York: Long Reads, Alternative Splicing and Human Diseases
written by fanggang
-
Job: Postdoc Fellow @ New York City: Alternative Splicing
written by fanggang
-
Methods to convert SOLiD reads to nucleotide space
written by gsc529 •
-
Event-based software for alternative splicing with three conditions?
written by htyu1lmzta •
-
News: Thank you Biostars!
written by Glory Basumata
-
Tool: rMATS: quantification of differential splicing
written by Anil Kesarwani
