Hello everyone!
I'm trying to work with workflows on galaxy. I have tested all the tools that I need separetely to confirm that it works, and the I proceeded to create my workflow.
This is the workflow (part of it for testing), for FASTQ files on RNAseq data:
For this workflow, I want my FASTQ files to proceed to FASTQC, and then the raw data of FASTQC to be concateneted on MULTIQC, which is a multisample quality check viewer.
The problem is that, even by creating a collection of data, galaxy is creating one FASTQC for each file, one multiQC for each file and then no multisample FASTQC and MULTIQC.
This is how the history looks like with this workflow
Am I'm doing something wrong? Collection of files is not the right step to create only one FASTQC and one MULTIQC with batch of files?
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
-
Trimmomatic
written by Mahsa80.mm •
-
Nextflow MultiQC runs multiple times due to FASTQC zip name collisions
written by DdogBoss •
-
Should I use unpaired reads from trimmomatic
written by dxj294 •
-
Fastqc in nextflow run only one pair of fastq.gz file and not on all Fastq files
written by rohitsatyam102
-
When to merge sequencing data from multiple lanes (FastQToSam, SamToFastq, BWA, MergeBamFiles, or a…
written by Jordi •
-
bioblend invoking galaxy workflow, but doesn't start
written by juliepevernagie •
-
FastQC on multiple paired end files
written by evelyn
-
Use Galaxy to find SNPs between two yeast genome fastq data
written by 85tracer •
-
How do you use MultiQC on FastQC files taken from SRA files?
written by beneopp •
-
Problem when having multiple Tophat runs inside one workflow in Galaxy
written by tunl
