I’m converting gVCFs to VCF, but the reference alleles are missing. An example below:
#CHROM POS ID REF ALT QUAL FILTER INFO FORMAT 180525_FD02929177
1 97547947 . T . . . DP=31 GT:DP:RGQ 0/0:31:81
1 97915614 . C . . . DP=40 GT:DP:RGQ 0/0:40:99
1 97981343 . A . . . DP=43 GT:DP:RGQ 0/0:43:99
2 234668570 . C T 539.64 . AC=1;AF=0.500;AN=2;ClippingRankSum=0.340;
DP=32;ExcessHet=3.0103;FS=5.748;MLEAC=1;MLEAF=0.500;MQ=60.00;QD=16.86;RAW_MQ=115200.00;SOR=0.150 G
T:AD:DP:GQ:PL 0/1:17,15:32:99:547,0,586
2 234669144 . G . . . DP=36 GT:DP:RGQ 0/0:36:99
which was made by break_blocks:
break_blocks --region-file /illumina/runs/con/concordance/fluidigm/fluidigm_positions.tab.bed --ref human_g1k_v37.fasta --exclude-off-target
I’m using GATK thus:
gatk --java-options "-Xmx4g" GenotypeGVCFs \
-R /illumina/runs/con/g1k_v37/human_g1k_v37.fasta \
-V fluidigm.gvcf.202009/HG00099.fluidigm.202009.g.vcf \
-O fluidigm.vcf.202009/HG00099.fluidigm.202009.vcf \
--allow-old-rms-mapping-quality-annotation-data \
--include-non-variant-sites
But none of the options in GATK seem to allow adding reference alleles to the REF column, everything is just .. When I try this manually with a Perl script, there are missing data, so programming it myself can’t work.
Do you know how I can add the reference alleles to VCF/gVCF?
1 answer
I don't see any entry with a missing REF. Could it be that you're visually matching the ID column in the header to the REF column in the data?
See below:
#CHROM POS ID REF ALT QUAL FILTER INFO FORMAT 180525_FD02929177
1 97547947 . T . . . DP=31 GT:DP:RGQ 0/0:31:81
1 97915614 . C . . . DP=40 GT:DP:RGQ 0/0:40:99
1 97981343 . A . . . DP=43 GT:DP:RGQ 0/0:43:99
2 234668570 . C T 539.64 . AC=1;AF=0.500;... GT:AD:DP:GQ:PL 0/1:17,15:32:99:547,0,586
2 234669144 . G . . . DP=36 GT:DP:RGQ 0/0:36:99
That's a different question - please search the forum and if you don't find a satisfactory answer, open a new question.
Given that this data is from a different person, odds are only they'll know why the QUAL doesn't have data - it's probably an accepted norm in gVCF. (I did a quick google and see something pertinent on this link: https://support.illumina.com/help/BS_App_TSA_help/Content/Vault/Informatics/Sequencing_Analysis/BS/swSEQ_mBS_gVCF.htm)
Log in to answer this question.
Please do not delete a question after it has been addressed in some way. Eyeballing columns wrong is a common problem and someone else could benefit from your experience.
Please accept my answer below using the green check mark on the left.
Heys! I'm having the exact same problem! Did you solve it? I would really appreciate it!