This seems to be the exact same question. Could it be an assignment question that multiple people following a course are seeing?
• 0 views
•
link
ATOM 1 N MET 1 -69.269 78.953 -91.441 1.00 0.00 N
ATOM 2 CA MET 1 -69.264 78.650 -92.891 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 4 C MET 1 -69.371 79.939 -93.633 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 5 O MET 1 -68.379 80.649 -93.799 1.00 0.00 O
ATOM 3 CB MET 1 -70.475 77.774 -93.251 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 6 CG MET 1 -70.505 76.455 -92.477 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 7 SD MET 1 -69.115 75.332 -92.806 1.00 0.00 S
ATOM 8 CE MET 1 -69.473 74.270 -91.377 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 9 N ASP 2 -70.583 80.284 -94.111 1.00 0.00 N
ATOM 10 CA ASP 2 -70.688 81.539 -94.789 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 12 C ASP 2 -70.661 82.602 -93.737 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 13 O ASP 2 -71.088 82.377 -92.606 1.00 0.00 O
ATOM 11 CB ASP 2 -71.963 81.733 -95.626 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 14 CG ASP 2 -71.691 82.908 -96.557 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 15 OD1 ASP 2 -70.569 82.953 -97.130 1.00 0.00 O
ATOM 16 OD2 ASP 2 -72.598 83.768 -96.717 1.00 0.00 O1-
ATOM 17 N HIS 3 -70.129 83.791 -94.077 1.00 0.00 N
ATOM 18 CA HIS 3 -70.045 84.846 -93.110 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 20 C HIS 3 -71.342 85.581 -93.094 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 21 O HIS 3 -72.113 85.574 -94.052 1.00 0.00 O
ATOM 19 CB HIS 3 -68.925 85.865 -93.404 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 23 CG HIS 3 -68.749 86.908 -92.336 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 25 CD2 HIS 3 -67.998 86.879 -91.200 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 22 ND1 HIS 3 -69.357 88.144 -92.351 1.00 0.00 N
ATOM 26 CE1 HIS 3 -68.947 88.797 -91.234 1.00 0.00 C
ATOM 24 NE2 HIS 3 -68.121 88.068 -90.504 1.00 0.00 N
This was already answered in this thread.
This seems to be the exact same question. Could it be an assignment question that multiple people following a course are seeing?
Log in to answer this question.
Some one help me please
Adding an answer to push your urgency a minute after adding a post is rude. Please do not do this.
Also, you've added zero detail to your question. Please read: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002202
I wouldn't exactly call this rude, but it is definitely a turn-off when posters act as if their problems are greater than those of others. If you are in such a hurry to get an answer, I suggest searching the whole site first. The answer to your question was already available on Biostars.
Literally a minute after creating the post, Mensur? I'd say that's definitely rude - it's almost a tantrum.
You seem to take some of these things personally, and seem to prefer assigning labels to posters and their actions. This is based on multiple observations and also from personal experience, because I was at the receiving end more than once.
Unless there is an unambiguous way to label someone's action - don't think that's the case here - I prefer to tell people how their actions make me feel. So in this case what the poster did is a turn-off for me. Every time you call someone rude based on posts that are similar to this one, that offends me, and I imagine it offends the posters as well. I think that in this case the poster may be called out for spamming, or for being inconsiderate, and probably several other things. Yet I don't see how asking for help multiple times is rude, even if it offends you or makes your job more difficult.
I suggest you consider the difference between typing:
Versus:
I think both are communicating the same message, but one of them has the potential to offend the posters and alienate them when it comes to future participation.
Appreciate the feedback. My take is that I criticize the action and ask that the user avoid it - I try my best to skip imperative sentences. Even here, I wanted the impact to be on the action, hence the "Please do not do this (previously mentioned rude action)". I take your point though, it is more annoying/spammy than rude.
Hello azeem839839!
Questions similar to yours can already be found at:
We have closed your question to allow us to keep similar content in the same thread.
If you disagree with this please tell us why in a reply below. We'll be happy to talk about it.
Cheers!
PS: Thank you for the heads up, Mensur.