This is a test version of Biostars. For the public version, visit https://www.biostars.org.
Reusability for scRNA-seq microfluidic chips

Hi all,

In most cases people throw away microfluidic chips that are being used for single cell RNA-seq, as the fear for cross contamination exists.

I was wondering, why is it so hard to clean and reuse them? And does anyone know a good protocol or paper for cleaning those chips that works? I think that if they can be cleaned successfully, it will save many groups some costs.

Thanks!

Edit: Even though it is not directly a Bioinformatics question, I guess that it are mainly Bioinformaticians who would know about this.

scrna-seq microfluidic chip
• 1,484 views • link
written by Diedes • Diedes

I don't think this is a bioinformatics question. It might be closed.

• 0 views • link
written by Ram Ram

Yes, but there is no better place to ask this, as it are mainly Bioinformaticians who would design such experiments.

• 0 views • link
written by Diedes • Diedes

1 answer

Here is how I would look at this. In many of these modern day marvels we don't fully understand what chemistry/nano-technology/nano-engineering magic happens on these devices (most of the stuff is proprietary).

If the chips could be safely re-used then the company would have some incentive to design/market them that way (they can claim to be environmentally responsible). Since that is not the case with many of these devices, it is not worth the time/effort to risk re-using them, especially with precious samples that may be irreplaceable.

In most instances you would still need to buy the reagents from the company anyway, which they may not sell to you without the chip. You also run the risk of voiding your instrument warranty, if you over-ride any of the protections built in (e.g. serial number/reagent lot scans).

While it is not the same thing, ONT sells a "wash kit" for their FC. I don't know how many use it.

• 0 views • link
written by GenoMax GenoMax

Hmm that wash kit is interesting, I am wondering if it would also work on every other chip haha. Maybe I'll mail them about it.

• 0 views • link
written by Diedes • Diedes

That kit is for nanopore flowcells, not micro-fluidic devices, as I noted above.

• 0 views • link
written by GenoMax GenoMax

I fully support the good answer of genomax.

Adding on it, you already get plenty of inconclusive and difficult-to-interpret results from single-cell experiments, I really would not want to add the additional uncertainty by reusing chips and deviate from the manufacturers protocol. Imho, this is an attempt to save money on the wrong end.

• 0 views • link
written by ATpoint ATpoint

Log in to answer this question.

More posts like this