Instrumental Variables and confounder in Mendelian Randomization
I think the assumption about the relationship between instrumental variables and confounder in Mendelian Randomization is not clearly explained. anyone can share the details requirement for the relationship between IV and confounder? Thanks.
• 1,424 views
•
link
written
by
Shicheng Guo
1 answer
Try this presentation: https://caleb-huo.github.io/teaching/2020SPRING/lectures/MR.pdf - particularly slides 11 & 12
• 0 views
•
link
written
by
Amy Mason •
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) summary statistics
written by handecadir •
-
Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization: Association between Instrumental Variable and Outcome
written by Nikki •
-
eagle2 + minimac4 script for phasing and imputation
written by Shicheng Guo
-
Standard pipeline for drug target discovery and identification
written by Shicheng Guo
-
How to calculate "expected loss-of-function variants" for a gene
written by Shicheng Guo
-
723 Cancer Gene Census Genes
written by Shicheng Guo
-
Perl/Python script: phased vcf to phased tped
written by Shicheng Guo
-
What's the difference between EGA, ENA, GEO, SRA and ArrayExpress
written by Shicheng Guo
-
R script to compare GEE, HLM, CLR
written by Shicheng Guo
-
Relationship table between SRX and SRR in SRA database
written by Shicheng Guo
