Fastq Splitter vs Fastq de-lancer on Galaxy
Hello Everyone
I have 1 RNAseq file (.fastq format) which has both forward and reverse reads. How should I proceed for Hisat2 alignment? Should I use Fastq Splitter or Fastq de-lancer on this file to map it? If it so why?
Thanks in advance
• 1,609 views
•
link
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
Because HISAT2 does not accept interleaved reads you will have to separate read 1 and 2 into separate files.
I just tried to align this file with Hisat2 (using library option -Pairend data from single interleved dataset) and this is alignment summary, what do u think about this?
Looks good. Your data appears to be aligning well.
Thanks!!! Incase I am not using this option and need to split the file into 2 parts, which tool should I use: Splitter or delancer?
Hmm. You did not de-interleave your reads and HISAT2 accepted that file?
Looks like Galaxy may be doing something under the covers to split the files and then feed them to HISAT2 or HISAT2 accepts interleaved reads (though the manual seems to make no mention of it). It appears to have worked right.
I looked up fastq splitter and de-interlacer on Galaxy. Looks like only difference is that
splitterexpects reads to have identical lengths. But otherwise you could use either. Or so it seems.I personally use
reformat.shfrom BBMap suite to de-interleave reads.