Dear all, I am new to the field. I have recently been using the new tuxedo pipeline (HISAT2 aligner and StringTie Assembler with "de novo" assembly) for RNA-Seq data of Arabidopsis thaliana (more details below). The pipeline in my hand has identified ~26K transcripts with ~15K being assigned a Gene Symbol from the reference gtf. I wonder if this ratio (68% of transcripts being assigned gene symbols) is within expected range? If you have experience with Arabidopsis RNA-Seq data, your input is appreciated.
Thank you for your reply beforehand.
More details on the data (if needed): - Samples: 18 - RNA Prep: SMART-Seq® v4 Ultra® Low Input RNA Kit for Sequencing (Clontech) - Library Prep: Nextera® DNA Library Prep (Illumina) - Seq: NextSeq500 sequencing - Cycles: 75Cycles(paired-end) - Sample Num: 18 - Ensemble References Used: Arabidopsis_thaliana.TAIR10.dna.toplevel.fa Arabidopsis_thaliana.TAIR10.45.gtf
1 answer
Yes, I would say that is according to expectations (70% "known" genes is about the point we are at in arabidopsis indeed)
Log in to answer this question.
-
Very low successfully assigned alignments with feature counts
written by Manuel •
-
Drosophila ultra low input RNA seq results - excessive clontech smart cds primers
written by barrbarrbinks •
-
Low Fraction Reads in Cells (Cellranger Count Pipeline)
written by Cricket •
-
Using featureCounts on paired-end reads aligned with HISAT2 resulting in 0 assigned fragments
written by turo.1 •
-
Validation of Aberrantly Expressed Genes Using TruSeq
written by v.nguyen0009 •
-
hisat2-stringtie-ballgown pipeline gives high p-value and q-value for RNA-seq of Arabidopsis thalia…
written by tiancaigg •
-
No Sensitivity/Accuracy output from gffcompare, what am I doing wrong?
written by RNAseqer
-
Low gene count assignment for ribo-depleted RNA-Seq data?
written by gabriel.rosser
-
Counting sense reads in bacterial paired-end RNA-seq data
written by biotech
-
Does Tophat Use The Library-Type Information For Mapping, Or Just For The Xs Flag?
written by gaelgarcia05
