Is this common to see two types of adapters in the same sequencing data?
Hello everyone.
Currently I am helping my PI to analyze the RNA-seq data. I just checked the data from FastQC but I found that one of them have two different types of adapters. One is universal adapter and the other one is illumina small RNA adapter. I never see this before so I don't know if it is common and how to explain it. Could anyone please help me to check the data?
I'll be very appreciated if you can help me!
• 1,042 views
•
link
written
by
lishen0709 •
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
FASTQC report - kmer content and determining type of sequencing
written by tea.vuki •
-
Parsing RNAhybrid output
written by baurumon •
-
dUTP sequencing -- different strand-ratios for different samples
written by mschmid
-
More informative GSEA enrichment ggplot
written by stephenwongscience •
-
RNA-seq analysis using RUVSeq: am I doing it right?
written by Ankur B. Sharma •
-
Blastn .XML to FASTA
written by baurumon •
-
How to create PSSM matrix
written by sepehr.salsabili •
-
Forward and Reverse strand on gene annotation
written by DanielC
-
DESeq2 log2FoldChange vs Salmon log2 TPM
written by liartom2 •
-
Explanation for kmer enrichment after skewer trimming of the RNA-seq reads
written by tobytaogf •
Please see How to add images to a Biostars post to add your images properly. You need the direct link to the image, not the link to the webpage that has the image embedded (which is what you have used here)
Sorry about that. I have changed another photo hosting platform.