Biostar Beta. Not for public use.
Question: DE analysis with edgeR and possibly batch effect
1
Entering edit mode

Hi all,

I'm using edgeR for recognizing differentially expressed genes between control and treatment groups of mice. Here, vd_s is control and vd_r is treatment at 1 day (vd_s1 and vd_r1) and 7 days (vd_s7 and vd_r7) after birth with two replicates. I used the following code with edgeR:

count <- read.delim ("vd_count.txt", row.names=1)
group <- factor(c(rep("vd_s1",2),rep("vd_r1",2),rep("vd_r7",2), rep("vd_s7",2)))
y <- DGEList (counts=count ,group=group)
keep <- rowSums(cpm(y) > 0.5) >= 2
y <- y[keep, , keep.lib.sizes=FALSE]
y <- calcNormFactors(y)
plotMDS(y, col=as.numeric(y$samples$group))

Here (MDS plot) is the MDS plot, I expected two groups of treatment and control; but as you can see, there is a separation between two times of 1 and 7 days, so, vd_s1 and vd_r1 separated from vd_s7 and vd_r7. Could you please let me know if it is a sign of batch effect? If yes, could you please kindly advise me how I can introduce it into R and remove it?

Thanks in advance

ADD COMMENTlink 11 months ago seta ♦ 1.2k • updated 11 months ago Devon Ryan 90k
Entering edit mode
0

I do not know - should there be a batch effect based on how you performed your laboratory work? Were you not expecting time to be the main source of variation among the samples? - we are talking about post-birth as the baby adjusts to the real World. What does a PCA bi-plot show?

Even if you want to adjust for what you conceive as a batch effect, you will then 'drown out' (eliminate) most or all of the effect of time

ADD REPLYlink 11 months ago
Kevin Blighe
43k
Entering edit mode
0

We don't know about which treatment you applied - and which effects you expect from that. I am not surprised to see that there is a bigger difference between 1- and 7-day old mice though.

ADD REPLYlink 11 months ago
WouterDeCoster
39k
2
Entering edit mode

I see no evidence of a batch effect in your data. That you have different results by day seems biologically expected and should be added to your model.

ADD COMMENTlink 11 months ago Devon Ryan 90k
Entering edit mode
0

Thank you very much for all the comments. Devon, your mean is using something like lrt <- glmLRT(fit, coef=2), yes?

ADD REPLYlink 11 months ago
seta
♦ 1.2k
Entering edit mode
0

You would need a factorial design: ~day + treatment or similar.

ADD REPLYlink 11 months ago
Devon Ryan
90k

Login before adding your answer.

Similar Posts
Loading Similar Posts
Powered by the version 2.0