Hi all
I have performed a GISTIC2.0 analysis in my samples, but after analyzing the results I found something that seemed a little off. In the results, there are some regions that are annotated to contain thousands of genes, e.g. 17q21.31 has 1018 genes according with the results. In the meanwhile, OMIM and http://atlasgeneticsoncology.org/ are showing far fewer genes for the same region. Has someone experienced the same?
Thank you. R
•
written
by
rin •
1 answer
That should not be surprising. OMIM and Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology are disease specific respositories that will only list genes relating to disease, whatever they may be. On the other hand, and depending on how you annotated your GISTIC 2.0 intervals, all genes (whether non-coding or coding, or associated to disease or not) will be listed.
Kevin
Log in to answer this question.
-
missing region in the process of annotation
written by Aki •
-
Functional annotation results with Eggnog mapper, For a same query several COGs, several GO:....
written by F.Bedjou •
-
GO analyses background genes
written by cagdas •
-
GSEA with GGProfiler2 (?"annotated" vs "known" for background control)
written by drodavis0 •
-
quantification RNAseq and normalization
written by kml •
-
Gene duplications in Transcriptome
written by Edphid •
-
Problems in dividing genome to non-overlapping bins and count genes
written by milk841103 •
-
gene duplication and differential gene expression analysis
written by amoltej
-
QC for broad domain chip-seq data?
written by Endre Bakken Stovner
-
Viable pathway tool for T-Cell activation pathway identification
written by onspotproductions
