This is a test version of Biostars. For the public version, visit https://www.biostars.org.
Analyzing 3' RNA seq library with DESeq2

I have a 3-prime RNA seq library which I have analyzed using STAR aligner followed by Salmon counter and currently analyzing the data using DEseq2.

It appears that I am getting many counts for some genes.. and I assume this is since I have used a 3' lib in which most reads are concentrated in a small region of the gene.

My question is - should I do something different in the analysis to factor this?

So far in this respect I only told Salmon to avoid length correction

Thanks!

rna-seq deseq2
• 3,606 views • link
written by roy.granit roy.granit

Probably not. If these genes are known to have high expression values and it's consistent along samples you shouldn't be worried.

• 1 views • link
written by Asaf Asaf

1 answer

It is quite normal that there is a huge span of expression values - especially on read counts - so you might want to switch to length normalized features (just use the TPM from the Salmon quantification). What you can do is calculate the fraction of the total expression which the top expressed genes (e.g. top 5) are responsible for.

• 1 views • link
written by Kristoffer Vitting-Seerup Kristoffer Vitting-Seerup

With 3' Seq you normally don't need length normalisation. You get - simply spoken - one read per transcript copy. The reads may be directly in the 3' UTR or are spanning junctions further downstream. In this regard, it's more like tag-counting than full-length RNA sequencing with abundance estimation.

If you have spike-in controls (like the ERCCs), I'd check these for the expected vs. observed expression.

You could also check BioGPS for the highly expressed genes, if they are known to be highly expressed in your given tissue.

• 1 views • link
written by michael.ante michael.ante

Thanks. I suppose DESeq2 will turn to TPM while doing the statistics..?

• 1 views • link
written by roy.granit roy.granit

No. DESeq wants raw counts. It will not correct for transcript length. It doesn't need that.

• 1 views • link
written by swbarnes2 swbarnes2

Log in to answer this question.

More posts like this