This is a test version of Biostars. For the public version, visit https://www.biostars.org.
STAR two -pass mode - lower alignment rate than one pass mode?

Hi guys,

Quick question. I've performed a two-step alignment with STAR 2.6a. It seems my unique alignment rates are approx 1% (85%) lower when performing two pass, than the original one pass mode (86%). I thought the aim of two-pass mode was to increase the number of reads mapping to novel splice junctions / % of maps aligned?

Am I wrong in my understanding?

star alignment two pass mode

If anyone wants to know why... see below:

Some drop in the uniquely mapped reads in the 2nd pass is to be expected, but it's typically ~1-2%. It's caused by the reads with short splice ovehangs, which can be mapped to multiple junctions.

As in STAR manual, it states:

It does not increase the number of detected novel junctions, but allows to detect more splices reads mapping to novel junctions. The basic idea is to run 1st pass of STAR mapping with the usual parameters, then collect the junctions detected in the first pass, and use them as ”annotated” junctions for the 2nd pass mapping.

So is it always recommended to run basic twopass mode for pair-end RNA-seq data?

0 answers

No answers yet.

Log in to answer this question.