Thank you so much! This is actually what I was struggling with (again, I have really basic questions...).
About the criteria for selecting gene IDs, I think this is key in order to have useful information. I would like to understand how similar the different samples are to each other. It's about developmental biology, so I'm trying to understand how each differentiation stage differs from the other ones.
Could a criteria simply be to take the highest 300 expressed genes in each set? Or is it too naive? I also have some gene ontology comparisons. Is there a way to take the genes that are represented in the most relevant GOs entries and use them to see whether are commonly expressed?
A Venn diagram isn't really going to tell you which genes are commonly expressed between conditions, just how many. Are you sure a Venn diagram is what you want? Or are you trying to determine common sets of differentially expressed genes between the different treatment comparisons? Regardless, we need more info as to what you're tried. Did the list you uploaded for each set contain only the IDs, one per row?
Ok sorry I realized my question wasn't very clear.
I would like to know how many genes are commonly or differentially expressed in different treatments (it's about stem cell biology, I would like to show how similar are two different developmental stages). So I thought of a Venn diagram. I have several excel tables obtained after DESeq2 analysis, were different pairwise comparisons were done. Yes, each row contains the IDs and the values per each sample (one triplicate per condition), here is a snapshot of how the table looks like: Snapshot
Oh, okay. If your only real goal is to show similarity between the two stages, something as simple as mentioning the number of differentially expressed genes between the two stages should really suffice, honestly. Venn diagrams aren't really a great construct for gene expression data, in my mind. Heatmaps generally look better and are immediately interpretable. Most people don't care about the genes that are similarly expressed between two conditions/developmental stages/whatever, the differentially expressed genes are the real meat that you should focus on in most cases.
use Venny http://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/
Santosh Anand : Apologies for high jacking this thread for a minute. You have been promoted to moderator status on biostars. Please join the biostars slack channel as described here: Inviting NEW Biostars moderators to join Biostars slack channel
Thank you very much @genomax for the best new year's gift :)
or DrawVenn if you have more than 4 lists
Hello dear, I am also trying for creating venn diagram to explain overlapping RNA-seq data. During my search i just saw this grateful discussion same like my problem and i am also not use to with bioinformatics tools.
As you suggested DrawVenn for more than 4-lists (I have 7-lists of my samples). i tried this online tool but it can't create venn diagram maybe due to more lists. Please recommend any other tool that can interpret all of my samples.
Sorry, but i am really confused
Thank YOU
You should use UpSet plots if you have 7 lists.
I have a general question regarding the type of data to be used for generation of the Venn diagram: would it make sense to use the genes identified via Gene Ontology? I have several comparisons being done AvsB and BvsA, or AvsC and CvsA, and BvsC and CvsB.
Could the gene list from these comparisons be used to check how similar samples A, B, and C are to each other?
Thank you very much!
Sounds to me like this is sufficiently different from your original question, so you may want to open a new thread for this.