Thanks for your advice! I did now use bowtie2 --sensitive-local for my samples (n=35).
The 35 samples varied widely in terms of their total alignment, ranging between 0.09% and 94% alignment! Much of the reads that aligned did so to more than one location, with 1-time alignment ranging between 0.01% and 40.45%. The samples fall somewhat uniformly between these extremes. There are about 1300 amplicon sequences, and each metagenomic read sample has about 400,000 sequences.
Is it surprising that there is such a range in the alignment rate and the 1-time alignment rate? Are there other software or preprocessing I should also look into? I do want to keep the overhang sequences.
I tried using Trim Galore! but most of the trimming only trimmed off 1-2 bases. Cutadapt would not work because I do not know the sequence. I do not believe the amplicon sequences require trimming, but could be wrong.
Any advice on additional measures to try would be greatly appreciated! Thanks again!