1D^2: Oxford nanopre technology
Hello all,
Recently, ONT introduced 1D^2 sequencing kit. I was wondering if someone has tried it. I want to know how different the fastq files look? Do we get 2 fastq files per sample (one per strand)? or it is one long file with improved accuracy?
TIA
• 2,558 views
•
link
written
by
KVC_bioinfo
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
HLA alignment, approximation and frequencies
written by oumo •
-
Quality check pipeline for PCR cDNA ONT sequencing output.
written by Sbrillo •
-
scaling for kallisto estimate counts
written by Meghan.T •
-
Long read RNA # of reads interpretation help
written by shinyjj •
-
bwa mem fastq order
written by guffrann •
-
Tophat problem - R1 and R2 reads mapped to different strandeds of viral genome
written by WZOUXM •
-
aligner for 1D^2 oxford nanopore data
written by KVC_bioinfo
-
Gmap aligner taking too long
written by KVC_bioinfo
-
Extracting randomly subset of fastq reads from a huge file
written by KVC_bioinfo
-
Multiplex In Exome Seq And "Customized/Capture" Seq Kits
written by CrazyB
I guess SEQanswers or ONT-community would be a better place for this question. You could also try Twitter!
Thanks! I will try there.
They've had 2D for a long time. By the time you got to FASTQs, it was indistinguishable from 1D (unless you specifically split template and complement strands). I assume the output would be similar for 1D^2.
yes. I haven't seen ow the output from 2D looks like. Hence, I am confused. I have only seen how the output from 1D looks like.