Hello there, I carried out two different approaches to analyse the differential expression of my .fastq files. Now I want to compare these two results in order to consider similarity and divergences of these different approaches. I think the best way to do this is by creating a Venn diagram. Anyone with something "more unpredictable" to surprise my supervisors? :)
•
written
by
Mozart
1 answer
Does comparing how the results are different from each other really tell you anything valuable? You only need the methods "to consider similarity and divergences of these different approaches". I would think comparing how much the results of both approaches are different from the truth would be a better question to answer. This then allows you to conclude which pipeline is best.
tip: spike-ins
Log in to answer this question.
-
How to perfrom a statistical test on a 3-way Venn Diagram
written by ivingan •
-
How to make venn diagram for differentially expressed data
written by rishav513 •
-
Comparison DESeq results using different model
written by concetta •
-
Explanation of Venn diagram output
written by munaj86 •
-
Differential expression analysis in DESeq2 for an experiment with multiple variable
written by Mozart
-
Different trimming for different batches within the same experiment
written by Mozart
-
sleuth vs deseq2
written by Mozart
-
Venn diagram for vcf files
written by sukesh1411 •
-
RPKM and differential expression analysis
written by harrietjamieson86 •
-
Deseq, Edger And Cuffdiff - Different Result
written by Nicolas Rosewick
