This is a test version of Biostars. For the public version, visit https://www.biostars.org.
WES or WGS analysis of cancer samples with no matched germline

Dear all,

although this question has been asked before (~ 2 years ago), if I may ask it again, as I am looking for some updated workflows, strategies, ideas :

"what would be the acceptable pipeline for processing WES or WGS data from primary tumors that do not have matched germlines sequences ?"

many thanks,

-- bogdan

snv cnv wgs wes
• 3,529 views • link
updated by markus.riester markus.riester • written by Bogdan Bogdan

Hi Wouter, thanks : we aim to identify the SNV and CNV in the tumor samples (and some of these samples do not have a matched normal sample).

• 0 views • link
written by Bogdan Bogdan

1 answer

MuTect and FreeBayes for SNVs are probably the most used tools for tumor-only analyses. Copy number, if you have some normals, you can try CNVkit, cn.mops (I think) and GATK4beta. If you need purity/ploidy and want to classify variants as germline vs somatic, there isn't much out yet, so we wrote our own tool PureCN (Bioconductor, try the much improved developer version if you like).

• 0 views • link
written by markus.riester markus.riester

Dear Marcus, thank a lot for your suggestions. Yes, we have been using MUTECT2 and cn.MOPS for detecting SNV and CNV in germline-tumor pairs. However, when we have only a TUMOR sample (with no GERMLINE sequence), may I ask, how would you run MUTECT2 ?

• 0 views • link
written by Bogdan Bogdan

Just run in without the normal BAM. The GATK3 version of MuTect2 doesn't officially support tumor-only analyses, but will do it. For GATK4beta, it's described in the documentation.

• 0 views • link
written by markus.riester markus.riester

Thanks Marcus ! thanks, it is working in GATK 3.8.

• 0 views • link
written by Bogdan Bogdan

Log in to answer this question.

More posts like this