WES or WGS analysis of cancer samples with no matched germline
1
1
Entering edit mode
6.8 years ago
Bogdan ★ 1.4k

Dear all,

although this question has been asked before (~ 2 years ago), if I may ask it again, as I am looking for some updated workflows, strategies, ideas :

"what would be the acceptable pipeline for processing WES or WGS data from primary tumors that do not have matched germlines sequences ?"

many thanks,

-- bogdan

SNV CNV WGS WES • 2.6k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

What is the aim of the analysis?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Hi Wouter, thanks : we aim to identify the SNV and CNV in the tumor samples (and some of these samples do not have a matched normal sample).

ADD REPLY
7
Entering edit mode
6.8 years ago

MuTect and FreeBayes for SNVs are probably the most used tools for tumor-only analyses. Copy number, if you have some normals, you can try CNVkit, cn.mops (I think) and GATK4beta. If you need purity/ploidy and want to classify variants as germline vs somatic, there isn't much out yet, so we wrote our own tool PureCN (Bioconductor, try the much improved developer version if you like).

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Dear Marcus, thank a lot for your suggestions. Yes, we have been using MUTECT2 and cn.MOPS for detecting SNV and CNV in germline-tumor pairs. However, when we have only a TUMOR sample (with no GERMLINE sequence), may I ask, how would you run MUTECT2 ?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Just run in without the normal BAM. The GATK3 version of MuTect2 doesn't officially support tumor-only analyses, but will do it. For GATK4beta, it's described in the documentation.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks Marcus ! thanks, it is working in GATK 3.8.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2485 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6