Good Pipeline for ChIPexo
Hello, I was wondering what was an ideal or the 'standard' pipeline for chipexo. Would something like raw seq results->fastq files->Bowtie for alignment -> GEM for peakcalling be good? Will this provide good 'enduser' data for the experimental scientist or is there another standard processing step? Would bowtie2 be better than bowtie?
• 1,720 views
•
link
updated
by
Ming Tommy Tang
•
written
by
bn •
•
written
by
bn •
1 answer
bowtie2 is for reads longer than 50bp if you have short reads such as 36 bp use bowtie1
• 0 views
•
link
written
by
Ming Tommy Tang
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Bioconductor scRNAseq tutorial constantly breaks down due to dependencies
written by bn •
-
When running salmon or star_salmon , are samples “independent” from one another during quantificati…
written by Pratik
-
Mark Duplicates
written by priya.bmg •
-
Puzzling Bowtie2 Input Error -S flag
written by geneticatt •
-
Processing .raw files or out.tar files from Mass Spec
written by K.patel5 •
-
Best way to call low-frequency SNVs in antibody sequence from FASTQ
written by maquino1985 •
-
GBS SNPs calling
written by shinken123
-
Coverage depth and breadth after recaliberation
written by nikkihathi •
-
Which NGS alignment algorithm has the smallest memory need?
written by mattbawn •
-
Tutorial: For Short Reads, Which Aligners Find All Hits Given Certain Edit Distance Threshold?
written by lh3
yes, the goal of ChIPexo is to obtain peak. So you just align the clean reads into reference genome and do peak calling using some softwares.