GEO submission for RNA-seq
Hello, one of the requirements to submit RNA-seq data to GEO is processed files which they describe can be:
- raw counts of sequencing reads for the features of interest, and/or
- normalized abundance measurements, e.g., output from Cufflinks, Cuffdiff, DESeq, edgeR, etc.
Has anyone submitted RNA-seq data before and what format did you submit processed data in? We were considering submitting cufflinks output but there are three different files that are output and I'm not sure which file would be used.
Is there a better format to submit??
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
No differential gene expression after tuxedo protocol
written by vinayjrao
-
.clc to fastq
written by Kasthuri
-
differential expression of human sample showing 63000 genes in output
written by Kritika
-
How to identify the loci producing differential small RNAs between two samples?
written by biolab
-
Getting a Count Matrix from GEO for RNA-eq
written by ahnje770 •
-
GFOLD diff input
written by tonja.r
-
why does cuffdiff command line contain parameters suited for cufflinks?
written by grokaine •
-
CCLE normalized/processed RNA-seq data
written by BIOTIN •
-
What is the difference between GEO and SRA ncbi databases?
written by matija.sosic •
-
Is There Any Other Method For Isoform-Level Differential Expression Analysis Except Cufflinks/Cuffd…
written by Huanwei Wang •
I would say that raw data is preferable, leaving everyone all possible options for analysis.
Processed data is requested in addition to raw data.
If I remember correctly genes.fpkm.tracking (something similar) is the one which is more relevant as a processed data.
Could you make sure or can someone else confirm this as well?