what's wrong with htseq-count codes???
1
0
Entering edit mode
7.3 years ago
biologo ▴ 40

hello, friends:

i was using the htseq-count to calculate the reads number, after run the tophat, then i isolate the uniqmapped reads, actually ,it was the paired-end reads, but i find uniqmapped reads only contain the single-end reads(no identical readsID),that is one thing that i fell confused??? next, i do like this:

samtools view -@ 5 -S uniqmap.sam -b -o uniqmap.bam
samtools sort -@ 5 -n uniqmap.bam -o sort.bam
samtools view -@ 5 -h sort.bam -o sort.sam
htseq-count -m union -s no sort.sam $GTF > union.out

and the result is nothing, err report that:

Warning: Read HWI-ST1434:279:HTFV7BCXX:2:1115:7046:27240 claims to have an aligned mate which could not be found. (Is the SAM file properly sorted?)
Warning: Read HWI-ST1434:279:HTFV7BCXX:1:1115:5605:41821 claims to have an aligned mate which could not be found. (Is the SAM file properly sorted?)
Warning: Read HWI-ST1434:279:HTFV7BCXX:1:2111:7809:19690 claims to have an aligned mate which could

can you help me figure it out???

RNA-Seq • 1.5k views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode
7.3 years ago

There is no need to filter the uniquely mapped reads yourself (likely the step which went wrong). Htseq count will be default only use read with mapQ >= 10.

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1976 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6