The main effects I can see are on staff choices about working here or not and on grants. This applies not just to us at the EBI, but every scientific institute in the UK who employ large numbers of international scientists.
We're damned good at getting visas for people, so even if immigration is restricted I can see that we would not have any trouble bringing people into the country, even with an Australia-style points system as is being proposed by the Leave campaign (our employees would get millions of points so that would be no worry). Perhaps we might have to wait a few weeks for visas to come through, but that would really have no impact.
However, I can see that people might question whether they would want to work here if we're outside the EU. Certainly, non-British colleagues have expressed discomfort at some of the rhetoric from the Leave campaign regarding immigration – some of it is pretty nasty and a vote Leave would prove that was the majority opinion.
There are also massive concerns about scientific grants. A lot of projects in the EBI and other institutes have EU-specific grants, which we would lose. I don't believe that we would anywhere near make up the shortfall from the piddling amount of money we would save by not paying into the EU.
Good question. I'm hoping that since the funding mechanisms for EMBL predate the current version of the EU that Brexit wouldn't muck this up. But man would I ever like to hear from someone who actually knows...
I hope too it would not. But maybe it would, e.g. by restricting immigration from EU, restraining investments, the mere uncertainty, crude statements ... I think we need to speak out in this matter.
Just on a timely side note, did I mention that there is for obvious reasons evidently not going to be any Brexit? So the question is now irrelevant.
I am not so sure about this.
I'm hoping you're right.