De novo assembly
Dear all,
Please let me know if I could use CLC Genomic Workbench 8.0 for De novo metagenomic assembly.
Thanks you all so much.
assembly
sequencing
next-gen
• 2,588 views
•
link
written
by
Huynh Nguyen •
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Extract CSV and SAM
written by mustafa_aljadi •Dear All I used CLC workbench to BLAST after I got my results I wanted to extract the result as CSV or Excel file. But …
-
How to extract genome from contigs
written by tasmiaa.saleem02 •I have a single end ion torrent hpv sample data. I have trimmed it with clc default parameters and done de novo assembly in clc …
-
Export error WITH AGP?
written by PK •Dear all, I am doing de novo assembly (aspergillus flavus) in clc genomics workbench when i export assembled file in fasta format i am getting …
-
Finding the transcript direction using stranded-specific library
written by setaHi all, I have paired-end stranded-specific library from Illumina sequencing, which assembled (de novo assembly) using Trinity. As I used the stranded-specific library, could you …
-
How to add blastx hit name to the related contigs of assembly?
written by sohra •<p>Hello experts,</p> <p>I'm quite new here, I did de novo transcriptome assembly and blastx against nr and uniprot databases. Could you please let me know …
-
Using generated transcriptome assembly by two assemblers
written by seta<p>Dear all,</p> <p>I performed de novo transcriptome assembly for a non-model plant using two assemblers, CLC genomic workbench and Trinity tool. Both assembly sounds good, …
-
Trinity Error with the the flag of --run_as_paired
written by setaI did de novo transcriptome assembly after trimming on about 320 million Illumina paired end reads (strand-specific library, FR) using CLC genomic workbench software. Now, …
-
High quality de novo transcriptome assembly rely on merging multiple assembly?
written by setaDear all, Please let me know your experience regarding combining multiple assembly (derived from different k-mer or different programs) to make the** best de novo …
-
why there is many broken paired reads in my Illumina reads and how to solve them?
written by setaHi everybody, My question is: what is the origin of broken paired reads? I'm challenging with the de novo transcriptome assembly using CLC genomics workbench …
-
strand-specific transcriptome Oases vs. CLC
written by wd •Hi I assembled an animal transcriptome *de novo* using strand-specific paired-end Illumina sequence data and the Oases/velvet software package (**supporting strand specific data**). Using the …
Ask CLC, it's a commercial product, they'll answer your phone call.
I will try, thank you so much.
You will need a license for the microbial genomics module for CLC which requires a separate license. Check with CLC support.
If you're looking for an alternative, a common assembler is Canu. Not sure what type of reads you have though.
Some information about my project: We aim to investigate diversity of microbial community in forest soil. In addition, we also focus on mining genes encoding laccase enzyme.
I sent my DNA samples to Baseclear company (in Netherlands). After that they gave me paired-end raw sequences and assembled sequence that was assembled using CLC Genomic Workench 8.0. I don't know that this Workbench was optimized for metagenomic de novo assembly. Is this method good enough for downstream bioinformatics analysis?
Thank you all for your help!
I am not sure you can use canu in this case.
You may want to try SPAdes or metavelvet. Both will require knowledge of unix/command line along with access to a proper server with enough RAM etc.
Right, illumina sequencing. You're right and Canu is not appropriate here. Just back from London Calling (Oxford Nanopore Conference) :-)
Thanks but what do you think about CLC Genomic workbench? Is it appropriate? I have already received assembled results from Baseclear and I am confusing about this results.
I don't know if there is a difference between the CLC genome assembler (and the one provided by CLC microbial genomics module). You are going to have to contact Baseclear and ask them which one they used for the assembly. Then call/email CLC tech support and ask them about difference, in case Baseclear did not use the microbial one. If they say that there are no differences then you should be able to go ahead with whatever else you want to do with this assembly.
If you want to start from scratch with fastq reads, we have given you a couple of options above.
Thanks so much for your suggestions.