Forum: Genome assembly is hard: the tardigrade genome.
Here is an interesting development that might be of interest to all bioinformaticians. Two radically different genomes have been assembled for the tardigrade. The authors of the the second paper believe that the results of the first are solely due to contamination.
A bioinformatician's worst nightmare is to wake up and realize that in that in a published analysis of yours something went awfully wrong. It could happen to us all.
• 3,609 views
•
link
updated
by
Ram
•
written
by
Istvan Albert
•
written
by
Istvan Albert
1 answer
Github repository for the BioArxiv paper. This is how science should work. Publish and show the actual code for it. Kudos to the authors.
Scripts and relevant processed data files for Boothby et al 2015 and Koutsovoulos et al 2015 tardigrade genome papers
• 0 views
•
link
updated
by
Ram
•
written
by
Istvan Albert
•
written
by
Istvan Albert
Log in to answer this question.
Here is more on the issue. Rival Scientists Cast Doubt Upon Recent Discovery About Invincible Animals
Another related article:
Inside the Bizarre Genome of the World's Toughest Animal
http://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2015/11/tardigrades-worlds-toughest-animals-borrowed-a-sixth-of-their-dna-from-microbes/417243/
A nice summary can be found here:
Quick Look at the Two Manuscripts on Tardigrade LGT
http://www.igs.umaryland.edu/labs/hotopp/2015/12/05/quick-look-at-the-two-manuscripts-on-tardigrade-lgt/
Funny how they made HGT the main plot in their story and then didn't really assess thoroughly (almost at all?) if it was real or just contamination. But yeah, quite a nightmare for the lead/corresponding authors..
Yes it could be a sort of a "group think". Once there was reason to believe that HGT might explain every oddity about this organism no one wanted to really question the very basis of that.