Hi,
I do not know if anyone has asked the similar question or has met the similar problem.
I have an RNA-seq (from Illumina, 75 bp) data. When I am aligning the reads with bwa to zebrafish genome and count the number of reads with featureCounts I got the following summary:
Sample-1
Assigned 9265562
Unassigned_Ambiguity 147537
Unassigned_MultiMapping 0
Unassigned_NoFeatures 3884814
Unassigned_Unmapped 265481
Unassigned_MappingQuality 0
Unassigned_FragmentLength 0
Unassigned_Chimera 0
Unassigned_Secondary 0
Unassigned_Nonjunction 0
Unassigned_Duplicate 0
When I am aligning with topHat2 and count the number of reads with featureCounts I got the following summary:
Status accepted_hits.bam
Assigned 197566
Unassigned_Ambiguity 3850
Unassigned_MultiMapping 114795
Unassigned_NoFeatures 54359
Unassigned_Unmapped 0
Unassigned_MappingQuality 0
Unassigned_FragmentLength 0
Unassigned_Chimera 0
Unassigned_Secondary 0
Unassigned_Nonjunction 0
Unassigned_Duplicate 0
The alignment summary in align_summary.txt is:
Reads:
Input : 344347
Mapped : 278609 (80.9% of input)
of these: 22834 ( 8.2%) have multiple alignments (2 have >20)
80.9% overall read mapping rate.
Why do I have such a big difference between the alignments? Moreover, the topHat alignment also has the following summary in bowtie.left_kept_reads.log:
16839634 reads; of these:
16839634 (100.00%) were unpaired; of these:
5058477 (30.04%) aligned 0 times
10330251 (61.34%) aligned exactly 1 time
1450906 (8.62%) aligned >1 times
69.96% overall alignment rate
Thanks in advance
ilyas
1 answer
If you have used the GENOME as reference, this contains introns
BWA is not splicing aware
Tophat uses bowtie for an initial mapping, but after that, it split the unmapped reads and try to map them again in a second round, This means that Topohat is splicing aware..
Log in to answer this question.