Assess Cufflinks assembly
Hello everybody,
I have carried out an RNA-seq project in order to identify putative novel isoforms and genes in different plant annotations with TopHat/Cufflinks. Is there a way to assess the quality of my new annotations compared to the reference annotations?
Thank you.
1 answer
Hi
Please see the old posts in Biostar itself, may be you have seen it already!
- Assessing The Quality Of De Novo Assembled Data
- Assessing Quality And Accuracy Of De Novo Genome Assembly
Best wishes
Sayuj
• 0 views
•
link
updated
by
Ram
•
written
by
sayuj.koyyappurath •
•
written
by
sayuj.koyyappurath •
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
How to derive sequence of novel transcript identified by Cufflinks
written by CY
-
How to find novel gene/isoform in 1 RNA-SEQ sample?
written by Whoknows
-
identifing isoforms by rna-seqencing
written by jila-hessani •
-
To know if genome of a plant variety from same species can be used to analyze RNA-seq data of other…
written by rajeshkumar_vinod •
-
Cufflinks and class codes
written by int11ap1
-
Difference between replicates and conditions in RNA-seq
written by Paul
-
Reads mapped to another chromosome in paired-end data of RNA-seq
written by int11ap1
-
Cufflinks With Gtf File
written by GouthamAtla
-
Rna-Seq: Distinguish Lncrna Of Smrna Precursors
written by int11ap1
-
Inferring Novel Exons From Rna-Seq Data
written by toshnam
if I understood correctly, you're looking for new isoforms and genes in a species in which there's already an annotation available, right?. I guess you could try to do a de-novo assembly (ignoring the annotation) and see how this compares with the first one you did. how many transcripts are found again and how many counts are assigned to each of them.
I already have discovered new isoforms. I just want to assess which annotation is better (mine or the reference one) according to the FASTQ file or reads I used.