Yeah, ok. Any ideas what I should do about those Ns? Thank you.
Hello,
I would appreciate any thoughts on this. In the FastQC report on my Illumina PE reads, the Per base N content is 0 while in the overrepresented sequences I have Ns. I haven't come across any discussion in Biostars or any where else where the overrepresented sequences are Ns. Can anybody explain why this could be and what I need to do about it. Thank you.
Edit: here are the links to the Per base N content and overrepresented sequence report from FastQc:
2 answers
The documentation states that you get a warning if the number of Ns is above 5%
The overrepresented sequences will raise a warning if they are over 0.1%
So you can see how the situation you observe could easily happen.
The 'NNNNNNNNNNNNNN.......' sequences (when present in a file) have a high chance to appear in the 'Overrepresented sequences' report because they... well... are all similar.
To prevent their appearance in the report, you can filter out all sequences that have N bases in proportion higher than 3-5% (your choice).
You will have to clean bad sequences from your file anyway, before putting it in your analysis pipeline.
Efficiently process (view, analize, clip ends, convert, demultiplex, dereplicate) SFF/FastQ files
Log in to answer this question.
Can you post the relevant output somewhere so we can have a look?