Should I Be Using K-Mer Coverage In Velvet Parameters Instead Of Nucleotide Coverage?
1
3
Entering edit mode
12.7 years ago
Panos ★ 1.8k

Is Velvet using k-mer coverage values instead of nucleotide coverage in its parameters?

Suppose, for example, that my average read length is 36bp and k-mer size is 21. If I want to eliminate all regions with coverage of 2x or below should I use '-covcutoff 2' or '-covcutoff 0.9' (the latter based on a formula in the Velvet manual which converts nucleotide coverage to k-mer coverage - see Section 5.1 in the manual)? What about the '-exp_cov' parameter? Should I use k-mer coverage values for this parameter, too?

velvet coverage assembly • 5.3k views
ADD COMMENT
3
Entering edit mode
12.7 years ago

yes 0.9, everything is kmer-coverage (read kmers per contig kmers), my understanding is that nothing is Velvet is x-coverage based, including exp-cov

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1536 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6