Biostar Beta. Not for public use.
Question: why expression value must be log2 transformed before further analysis, such differential analysis?
7
Entering edit mode

Hi, just as the title.

When using microarray, the intensity should be log transformed, that is partly because the intensity values are relative numbers. But in RNA-Seq, why must RPKM be log transformed?

I also notice that the differential analysis results are largely different with/without log transform. why? anyone tell me? thank you.

ADD COMMENTlink 5.8 years ago jlshi.nudt • 180 • updated 5.8 years ago mikhail.shugay 3.3k
Entering edit mode
0

Who told you this? Log transformed expression are easier to detect DEG with low expression level. However, I never heard it's a must to log transformed them.

ADD REPLYlink 5.8 years ago
Xingyu Yang
• 260
Entering edit mode
0

I just saw this transformation on many papers resolved with RPKM and microarray expression data. It seems to be a usual convention.

Btw, I guess that low expression levels are not believable, so I always to filter with some threshold value.

ADD REPLYlink 5.8 years ago
jlshi.nudt
• 180
4
Entering edit mode

The general reason to log-transform data (log2 or otherwise) is to make variation similar across orders of magnitude. This isn't really a must, but usually makes things more convenient. Having said that, tools like limma are expecting log2 values, so if you're going to plug your RPKMs into it then it'd be a very good idea to log2 them first.

ADD COMMENTlink 5.8 years ago Devon Ryan 90k
2
Entering edit mode

Indeed microarray values and RPKM/FPKM values are better correlated when log-transformed. The reason for it is that the distribution of RPKM/FPKM values is skewed, and by log-transforming it we could bring it closer to normal distribution. It is needless to say that many statistical tests require normally-distributed data..

ADD COMMENTlink 5.8 years ago mikhail.shugay 3.3k

Login before adding your answer.

Similar Posts
Loading Similar Posts
Powered by the version 2.0