Different Selection Results Using Bioperl:Mk And Bioperl:Paml
I was wondering if others get drastically different results performing the MK Test and dN/dS (via PAML) on the same sequence data. While both tests detected selection, they were on different genes. Does this mean there is a glitch in the Bioperl packages? Or this a normal result of MK and dN/dS (Ka/Ks) tests?
Thanks!
• 802 views
•
link
written
by
anin.gregory
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
How can I interpret the results of a likelihood ratio test between substitution models?
written by Mimmi Ahlmén •
-
Problem with CODEML parameters
written by aeonswhisper •
-
Level of selection
written by ibasan •
-
How can the node distances affect to the omega values on the site model performed by codeml?
written by DR •
-
Positive Selection And Evolutionary Model Selection
written by Pappu
-
Bio.Phylo.Paml.Codeml'S Results Parser Quietly Fails To Read All The Data
written by a1ultima
-
What Does Elevation Of Dn/Ds Ratio Indicate?
written by qiyunzhu
-
How To Interpret Omega Value 999 In Paml Results?
written by Cacau
-
Ka/Ks (Or Dn/Ds) Calculation From Sequenced Transcriptome Contigs
written by tom.newport •
-
Best Practices/Softwares To Calculate Ka/Ks Ratio
written by Jarretinha
