eHOMD database: Ref seq Aligned FASTA vs Full RefSeq?
I am working with 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing data (targeting the V3–V4) and would like to use the eHOMD database for taxonomic assignment. I noticed that eHOMD provides "Ref seq Aligned FASTA File " and full RefSeq Version of the database. Which version is more appropriate for 16S amplicon analysis?
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Bacterial community profiling using 16S rRNA nanopore sequencing
written by Cedrick •
-
Hello, I analyzed ONT 16S amplicon data using the EPI2ME workflow with Minimap2, but the output doe…
written by Ramen •
-
V3V4 16s Sequencing, lots of merged reads that are too short
written by Emilie •
-
Comparing v3 and v4 datasets with v3-v4 amplicon datasets
written by bioinfo
-
Extract 16S rRNA V6 region
written by dpc
-
Tutorial: Principles and Workflow of 16S/18S/ITS Amplicon Sequencing
written by contact •
-
How to cluster 16S fastQ files and run on Prodigal to determine the genes in metagenomic sample?
written by chandandeepk •
-
Extract V3-V4 regions from 16s sequences
written by Florian Plaza Oñate •
-
How to calculate sequencing depth for 16S amplicon sequencing
written by sifujio •
-
Normalization of certain gene abundance in a metagenome
written by bioinfo
